Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money in saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
There is a number of minority languages may be disappeared in the near future. Regarding the expenditure of state budget on circulating these languages, although some people state that it would be a waste of money, I believe that it is necessary to protect and preserve these languages.
There are several reasons why saving minority languages could be seen as a waste of money. Firstly, the actual fees and costs to promote such languages are probably high due to investment in coursebook, payroll and other facilities, while there are not many people interested in studying and mastering these languages. Moreover, it is thought that they are not used as a mean of communication in commerce, trading, or foreign investment that render the country financial benefits. Therefore, those who opposes the idea of allocating the state money to these languages hold view that the generalization of the languages does not contribute to economic development of the country.
Despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should try to preserve languages that are less widely spoken because this action acts as a precursor for the preservation of cultural identity. Actually, languages are used to compose pieces of traditional music such as Bai Choi (a northern Vietnamese traditional type of singing) or Truyen Kieu, a prominent poem, has been translated into more than 30 languages, originally composed in ancient Vietnamese characters have not been spoken nowadays namely Han Ngu. Thus, protecting these special language drives the preservation of cultural identity.
In conclusion, I gravitate towards an opinion of that there is no a waste of money if the competent authority invests in minority languages preservation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ate towards an opinion of that there is no a waste of money if the competent autho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37132352941 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02596311057 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591911764706 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.6725547861 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.1 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323528146837 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119233345405 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727687992839 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182896094651 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0771680450484 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.