Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both the

Essay topics:

Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are
spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that
governments should spend public money on saving these
languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Nowadays , the extinction of some less widely spoken languages is sowing the trepidation of societies all over the world. Some people believe that authorities should make a frantic attempt for preservation of these languages, while , others hold the opposing view vice versa and concerning that it is the waste of money . In this essay I shall put forth both sides of an argument.

On the one hand , some people allege that it is more preeminent to have one language for country and launching actions to save other small languages might cost as a frugal. Because such kind of projects require a large sum of money and robust attachments. Admittedly, Government should pump it's fiscal to provide high quality education, qualified staff , good conditions and take some aid from media in order to carry out these actions. As these languages' scope area of speakers is exorbitantly low, conducting large projects seem to be splurging of budget. Rather encouraging authorities to invest such kind of programmes which have no any considerable benefits from the both industrial and social perspectives, it is more plausible to pay attention other sectors which are more viable.

On the other hand, it is inevitable that every language is an important asset of country. Regardless the low number of speakers , the underlying significance and role of these languages are much more outstripped than people anticipated. Every language has vital connection with cultural identity. Therefore ditching the preservation of these languages by reasoning help to other more fullfiling fields might turn to backfire and lead loosening of cultural identity in the long term. So swift actions should be implemented in order to eschew possible dangers of this ominous trend.

In conclusion, I reckon that any language,even less widely spoken ones is the backbone of country and stable society's background. So states should grapple with the problem of extinction as much as faster.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
Nowadays , the extinction of some less widely spok...
^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple believe that authorities should make a frantic attempt for preservation of th...
^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r preservation of these languages, while , others hold the opposing view vice vers...
^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...concerning that it is the waste of money . In this essay I shall put forth both si...
^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sides of an argument. On the one hand , some people allege that it is more pree...
^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...ave other small languages might cost as a frugal. Because such kind of projects require ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... high quality education, qualified staff , good conditions and take some aid from ...
^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s these languages scope area of speakers is exorbitantly low, conducting large pr...
^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ojects seem to be splurging of budget. Rather encouraging authorities to invest such ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...vest such kind of programmes which have no any considerable benefits from the both...
^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y. Regardless the low number of speakers , the underlying significance and role of...
^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...tal connection with cultural identity. Therefore ditching the preservation of these lang...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , even
...n conclusion, I reckon that any language,even less widely spoken ones is the backbone...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, while, i reckon, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26517571885 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89076489076 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597444089457 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1790081248 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.866666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.01903807615 259% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344560062045 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095867324232 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602998523115 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184018897323 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798025921824 0.056905535591 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.