Should governments spend money on people who are already ill or on preventive diseases?
It is true that governments around the world have been working hard determining the best budget allocation mix between preventing future and treating current illness. Although ill people need medical treatments, governments should give the priority to preventive avenue for curable ones.
The first reason is that it is a more effective way to spend money on healthcare. First, by focusing on promoting healthier lifestyle, some potentially fatal diseases would be prevented. For example, due to lack in preventive approach, millions of African people have been threatened by a whole host of epidemics. Second, spending money on preventive approach ensures that current and future citizens can live longer and happier than did previous generations. If more parks and free health facilities are built,people will have enough spaces and tools to do physical exercise.
It is also more efficient to invest in enhancing people's lifestyle. By playing sports regularly, the society will appreciate the importance of health, which therefore puts less pressure on medical care. For instance, after people become more aware of their health, national hospitals and private clinics are much less crowded. In addition, the government's finance would be safe as there are fewer cases requiring medical treatments. Thanks to this, the government can take steps to reinforce hospitals and other public services, bettering life standard of the whole country.
In conclusion, it is more effective and efficient in the long term to focus on preventive approach. This benefits not only governments but also the citizens' health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d give the priority to preventive avenue for curable ones. The first reason is t...
^^
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , people
...rks and free health facilities are built,people will have enough spaces and tools to do...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...efits not only governments but also the citizens health.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50403225806 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80969119196 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661290322581 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3786352522 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262504112656 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785835823936 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604952649199 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14584694219 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646089653388 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.