Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance?
Discuss this issue, and give your opinion.
Expert throughout the developing and developed world have debated whether visiting fees to museums and art galleries are imperative or not. Alongside the arguments from both sides, the latest discoveries have casted light on this question based on their running cost and visiting figures. This essay will assert that users of these buildings should be charged using the examples in Hong kong to demonstrate points.
To begin with, the operation cost is intuitively perceived as a plausible explanation of imposing a charge for visiting museums and art galleries. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly the cost of acquisitions is exorbitant at large. Secondly, the pays that sustain these artistic facilities are significant. In fact, the annual report from the Hong Kong Museum Management Office established that the income from admission fee has been effectively underpinned the operation of its properties over the past decades. Consistent with this line of thinking is that museums and art galleries would have faced bankruptcy if no charge had been imposed on their entries. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that admission ticket has an important role to play on sustaining an artistic site.
Although there is a number of reasons supporting the existence of visiting fees, some suggest museums and art galleries should be free of charge. This is largely because the extravagant tickets preclude the grassroots from inspiring by these great works, which in turn hinder the free flow of information. For instance, the annual report also ascertained that the majority of its visitors were in fact highly paid as professions such as doctors, designers and architects. Admittedly, frequenting to museums or art galleries necessitates a large amount of money; however, it is not a necessity of living in a city. Seen in this light, the offer of fee of concession suffice to meet with the need of certain classes.
In conclusion, admission fee has a vital significance on sustaining the development of museums and art galleries, despite deterring some people from gaining access frequently. Given the constant inflation, it is predicted that the operation cost entailing maintenance and security will surge in the foreseeable future. Therefore, it is possible to state beyond doubt that users of museums and art galleries should be charged.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35483870968 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91238102465 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6362744941 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.176470588 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245468598056 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747089801718 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789719827836 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149454603724 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410491436763 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.