Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nationality by providing such things as food and education? Or it is responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves
Nowadays, we could read and hear a lot of stories about different issues such as criminal activities, terrorism and immigration in all types of media. One of the most prominent reasons for these events is related to uneven distribution of wealth between countries. It is totally agreed that developed or wealthy countries need to help other people from other countries especially poor countries. This subject will be proven by scrutinizing various aspects of this controversial topic.
One of the crucial problems that all countries are faced is violence and terrorism. As an example, some terrorist groups like ISIS established in the Middle East in 5 years ago. The activities of this immoral group not only have been vast numbers of troubles for Asian people but also some developed countries get into troubles now. A lot of members of these type of teams come from the area where they suffer various economic difficulties like some African countries, some Asian nations, or even European countries. They attract to these types of groups only for gain money. Therefore, if wealthy countries could help them by supplying some educational facilities or food and amenities in some countries, it would reduce the tendency to these sort of terrorist groups.
Todays, some developed countries have a lot of plight for illegal immigrations. Although it is not a new phenomenon, but especially in recent years, it is dramatically grown. One key issue that sociologist recognized as a main (the main re) reason, is related to economic depression and monetary situation of emigrants. For instance, Africans have immigrated to Italia in huge groups, and they sometimes endanger their lives. This emigration causes a lot of problems for Italia government. As it can be inferred from the passage, living in an unsuitable condition, unemployment, illiteracy can affect all countries without any exception.
As it mentioned above, wealthy countries should aid undeveloped countries not only for moral and ethics aspects but also for their security. If this irresponsibility in all of the world, it is predicted that all nations get into new crises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this sort' or 'these nulls'?
Suggestion: this sort; these nulls
...ntries, it would reduce the tendency to these sort of terrorist groups. Todays, some...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cy to these sort of terrorist groups. Todays, some developed countries have a ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plight seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of plights'.
Suggestion: a lot of plights
... Todays, some developed countries have a lot of plight for illegal immigrations. Although it i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r security. If this irresponsibility in all of the world, it is predicted that all nations...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for instance, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25655976676 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93169817425 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556851311953 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1782693022 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.166666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.069709180567 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207733731022 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267702067591 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530829659027 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391376646956 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.