Small shops in towns and villages are closing and replaced by big stores. Explain your opinion.
There is no doubt that go shopping to an ordinary outlet is considered as so far from a developed societies’ shopping style as good as in every modern, wealthy states in this competitive century. In fact, the rivalry of business people is the result of banning small shops, constructing thousand-hector multi stored huge shopping centers on purpose being above than others. In this essay, I pen down some pros and cons, comprehendingly a coin has two sides consequently I refer my own idea.
On the one hand, there is a quite variety of advantages if mega markets are constructed in each county-side in order to find residents themselves in a convenient condition during the shopping not only a wide range of goods or high quality of products but also extra ordinary facilities such as a café, a restaurant, and a leisure time activity centre as well as. Moreover, each gigantic shopping mall is able to guarantee their products and consumers do not have to move in one outlet to another in big shopping malls because they find whatever they need in one building either.
On the other hand, turning to drawback of dominant mega markets in a town can be found in some reasonable cases. To be more specific, there appears a mega shopping market instead of 20 small local outlets, the town residents face expensive price list on every product because of high renting fee.
In conclusion, in my opinion, it is not a tragedy if big shopping malls replace small shops because the advantage of gigantic markets outweighs over small ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('variety') instead of another adjective.
...own idea. On the one hand, there is a quite variety of advantages if mega markets are const...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88593155894 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82885645336 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623574144487 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5930533407 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.625 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.875 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.0 7.06120827912 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195501214985 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859507860652 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858699862234 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136966226968 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936441709271 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.