Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledg

Various researches, meta-analyses and experimental studies have shown that inhaling cigarette smoke has detrimental effects on health of active as well as passive smokers especially respiratory cancers. The odds of having lung cancer among active smokers are high than the odds among non-smokers. Evidences have shown that infants living with smoker parents have high chance of getting Sudden Infant Death Syndrome than their counterparts. Despite not smoking, passive smokers have a similar chance of getting different health problems.

In my personal opinion, smoking should be banned in all public places. It is supported by the fact that societal benefits are way above personal benefits in certain circumstances. Various countries have the rules and law regarding penalty of fine or jail for smoking in public. On the one hand, the discipline, patriotism and compliance to law are reflected by banning public smoking whereas on the other hand the healthy human resource are spared for the development of the country.

Banning might restrict some people's freedom of smoking. Some people might be dependent smoker, in the absence of which they cannot function properly on their daily activities. For such people, private smoking areas and rooms in hotels, restaurants, malls can be allocated for the mutual benefits of smokers and general people. Heavy tax should be imposed in tobacco materials to discourage people to smoke.

In conclusion, I would say that cigarette smoking should be strictly banned in public places to protect general people from exposure from smoke and reduce health and economic burden but allocation of private smoking zones can be done to maintain people's right to freedom of action.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ing different health problems. In my personal opinion, smoking should be banned in all public...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...country. Banning might restrict some peoples freedom of smoking. Some people might b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd reduce health and economic burden but allocation of private smoking zones can...
^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h and economic burden but allocation of private smoking zones can be done to mai...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4328358209 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66764689232 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5120106803 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21594422982 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780435039587 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626663580322 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138900244222 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571206449492 0.056905535591 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.