Nowadays, in many schools various theories of learning are adopted like multi methods, multimedia, learning by doing, vocational and practical education. Many children are forced to stay and study subjects that will be of little value to them in future. For instance children majoring in business and commerce are forced to learn arts and literature, music, language and sports and so on. Needless to say, this might prepare children to adapt in every situation or learn some life skills and make then all-rounder.
The children not majoring in the subjects should be allowed to leave school early. These irrelevant subjects make then jack of all trades but master of none. These children might cause chaos by asking unnecessary questions, disrupting others, being sleepy and yawning. In addition to this, their own productive time is killed. This time and effort could be spared on other activities for achievement of best outcomes.
Even though these subjects could rarely help them in future occupations, some might be life skills. For instance, swimming and sports might help a person stay active and healthy; different languages learnt might be helpful in future professional endeavors. Similarly, a person with good taste on arts and literature is never considered a bad one.
To conclude I would say that those subjects which have little value for children in future should not be focused much and they should be allowed to leave school early but in their leisure time they can learn life skills and out of curriculum knowledge which eventually becomes handy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ts that will be of little value to them in future. For instance children majoring in busi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...red on other activities for achievement of best outcomes. Even though these subjects...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, then, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2125984252 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56237216881 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590551181102 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1506811666 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102546498697 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039611844776 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371544060886 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663582390177 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175081444065 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.