Solving environment problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
These days, Global warming and air pollution are now frequent headlines on TV and in the newspapers all over the world, which keep us reminding of obligation to protect the environment. Some say this is an important topic for each nation, also it should be in international organization’s hands. I disagree with this statement for some reasons.
Having said that, environmental responsibility of governments around the world have a chain effect, benefitting not only the host country but also neighborly nations. Some say authorities in each area can understand causes and tackle them correctly. However, people feel that environmental problems are too complex for individual people to cope with. Thus, the government can take proactive measures to make people more environmentally responsible. Therefore, local states can impose campaigns which reach people realize and distinguish currently issues.
On the other hand, an international organization would act as a leader, issuing principles for all member countries to conform in the same way or it will have sufficient financial capabilities to support the improvement of the environment. Cited cases are the Kyoto protocol has contributed to the slowing down of climate change on the earth, or the United Nations’ support for Third World countries have helped improve the air quality there. This argument, however, fails to take into consideration the fact that compulsion often backfires if an individual nation has no intention to cooperate, or the incentives provided can make recipient countries over reliant and avoid coming up with innovative ideas to resolve their country’s environmental situation. This in the long term exerts a negative overall global effect.
In conclusion, uprooting environment problems should be the responsibility of each national government rather than an international organization.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, third, thus, as to, in conclusion, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97802197802 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.74890127338 2.80592935109 134% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681318681319 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7409943482 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162306544254 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659251397403 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955289449133 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145307082653 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116731817408 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.