Some children do not have the natural ability to learn languages. Some school should not force children to learn foreign language.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the modern world, there has been a huge transference in people's attitude towards acquiring another language. Consequently, this raises the question whether children without genetic talent to acknowledge a foreign language should be compelled to learn it. Although the majority of the society thinks the educational system should oblige children to do so, I recommend that a foreign language should be taught as a compulsory curriculum.
There is a conspicuous evidence demonstrating why people support their view. Those defendants often argue that forcing children to learn another language imposes a massive burden on them since they have to study under the pressure of obligation and punishment. As a result, this trend is able to affect children's spiritual health which is the preponderant cause of numerous circumstances of mental disorder and isolation.
On the contrary, I wholeheartedly believe that a foreign language regardless of continents and culture should be made a mandatory one even if students are unable to acquire it. I would argue that achieving another language is significantly associated with a manifest chance of a prosperous career. There is an inevitable fact that employees with a certificate in another language have a tremendous advantage to be assessed for promotion with a higher remuneration. Vietnam has been cited as an example since candidates with the IELTS qualification tend to be offered key positions, for instance, staff manager. Moreover, in the international integration era, the acquisition of another language is prioritised. The reason for this argument is that global interrelationships are considered to be the most indispensible feature; therefore, mastering a foreign language means a stronger close-knit between distinctive cultures, otherwise it would be impossible to accomplish such correlation.
To put things in a nutshell, I wholeheartedly support that the curriculum for another language should be obligatory in schools on the global scale due to its advantages, namely future occupations and international connections. I suggest that national authorities should simplify the teaching process and provide adequate facilities with experienced tutors to ensure that children can understand flawlessly regardless of their ability status.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...her language. Consequently, this raises the question whether children without genetic talent to ackn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72807017544 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33384755447 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7799996847 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.928571429 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252927156073 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829016032926 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712187616618 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15829295609 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580615005173 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.