Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, many kids use smartphones excessively on a daily basis. There are several reasons for this action. While this case might have various benefits, I believe that there will be numerous drawbacks.
Over usage of smartphones in youngsters is due to various causes. The first reason is that using mobile phones is undoubtedly entertaining. This is because these devices contain
varied activities, such as games, attractive videos, and social media, which are highly captivating to children. Furthermore, smartphones are convenient in this present age. These technologies allow youngsters to study, search for information, or communicate with friends.
To be clear, they can do almost everything by just using their smartphones.
This is more likely to be advantageous for children in different ways, but it is also a negative development. One positive aspect is that spending time with smartphones helps children adapt to the technology era. This will facilitate them in their future career. This means that kids will be able to work in high-tech industries. The other critical benefit is that youngsters can develop themselves. In addition, children can broaden their knowledge by studying faster and wider due to various useful sources on the internet. On the contrary, smartphones cause big negative impacts on children’s health. For example, blue light from electronic devices damage their eyes.
In conclusion, there are more and more kids using smartphones every day, which can be explained for different reasons. In my opinion, whereas this phenomenon might have positive impacts, it also comprises several disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.612 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98151370951 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6251120252 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.8421052632 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1578947368 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305944871162 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863471266402 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489874612977 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136813282847 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067783655701 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.37 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.