Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. Which solution is better?
It is a controversy that people should be encouraged to live in a residential area with tall houses, or constructing a house on a large space to stay would be a better option. In my opinion. I am inclined toward the second choice.
To begin with, there is a benefit of creating tall buildings in metropolitan areas. First and foremost, due to the urbanization process of many areas, citizens tend to reside the industrialized cities. This allows them to have access many job opportunities and modern facilities. Therefore, more people focus on a certain area, which creates a phenomenon of being a lack of the land. As a result, building apartments or skyscrapers helps to bring more accommodations for people to study and work in these places.
However, I would argue that it would be more comfortable and flexible when houses are created on a large area of land. The initial reason is that having a house built on a big area would help to broaden space for leisure activities and spectacular decorations. For instance, a garden in front of a house allows children to do outdoor activities such as football instead of using digital gadgets to play computer games, which probably jeopardizes their eyes. Furthermore, people’s houses could adapt to more construction designing types on a large area rather than a small and cramped one. From this phenomenal merit, builders could design more houses which bring about the uniqueness and impression for owners’ private space.
In conclusion, although it is necessary and compulsory when people tend to construct tall houses and buildings in cities, I believe that a wider area would be more ideal and favorable to build a house.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, second, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01423487544 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92592056148 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583629893238 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8437605716 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323284469174 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102327849855 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809463310812 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191486535425 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562389645685 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.