In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles, while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars. Why is this the case? Which development do you think is better?
Cars and bicycles are the main transports in some part of the world. While in some urban areas, cars are the main transport to travel, the other areas tend to ride bikes. Although using cars to traveling have several positive, it seems to me that riding bikes are the greater choice. This essay will examine several reasons for these views.
There are several reasons why people chose driving a car instead of cycling. First, driving a car is more convenient and comfort than cycling. Therefore, when going to workplaces or hanging out with friends, the car is a reasonable choice. The other reason for this point is when compared with vehicles like cars or motorbikes; cycling is not time effective. For instance, with the same distance, it would take driver double or triple faster than bicycle riders.
It is also true that riding bikes becoming increasingly popular in some urban areas. Due to exhaust fumes from cars, which may have a devastating effect on the planet and lead to global warming, cycling might be expected to cut down emissions. Also, Riding bike is essential for health not only maintain a healthy body but also reduce the risk of some diseases such as cancer, diabetes and heart diseases.
In conclusion, these points have both pros and cons depends on the urban citizen view. In my opinion, although there are several benefits of driving a car, I would argue that cycling is a greater choice and it should be encouraged by the urban authorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to drive'.
Suggestion: to drive
...re are several reasons why people chose driving a car instead of cycling. First, drivin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85317460317 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41766341162 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.20588135 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3571428571 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188725404714 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066927326066 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501353376004 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102784805675 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054220869176 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.