Sports have become an unavoidable piece of each general public. As needs be, organizations take sponsorship of them so as to publicize their items and organizations. While some accept that it is the most ideal route to the commercial, others think this could have negative impacts.
Some demand this is helping organizations to sell their items and administrations. Lunch of the new products, for instance, the football crew on an International game wear another structure of their shoes that the support organization creates with the goal that it is an expansion in their sell when they focus on another gathering of individuals who watch the game.
Then again, it is contended that help competitors or sports groups could be a main factor for organizations' monetary emergency. For example, sports players whose organizations contribute bunches of cash on them engage in an outrage or dishonorable circumstance, such as utilizing medications or going to unseemly gatherings, so support loses their notoriety among the individuals and needs to pay tremendous measure of fine for tidying up the stunning episode.
In spite of the fact that, organizations may lose cash if their groups or sports symbols stumble into moral difficulty, in purpose of my view publicizing items or administrations through sponsorship is exceptionally effective. Clearly, individuals have a most loved games group or competitors, with the goal that they tail them in online networking or rivalry and they see what they wearing, drinking or publicizing, so they purchase the careful item and raise organizations' sell rate.
All in all, I accept that the commercial business has been improved throughout the years and firms endeavor to utilize everything in this business even sponsorship of sports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ave become an unavoidable piece of each general public. As needs be, organizations take sponso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... organizations take sponsorship of them so as to publicize their items and organizations...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38214285714 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18109650907 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.5239515611 49.4020404114 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.7 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751632015369 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039749431988 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058382739466 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.043535693396 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483381309171 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.