It is true that the criminal rate in many nations has been a significant issue. While I argue that increasing in the number of police is a good idea, I also believe that there are various ways to deal with the situation.
At the outset, there is a common belief that if authorities allocate more police to areas where the rate of offenders is high, the security status in those places will probably be keep stability. Firstly, a primary reason why criminals can fulfil illegal activities is a lack of strict surveillance. By rising the quantity of police, more violent activities are likely to be prevented from the beginning. Secondly, the increasing in the presence of police on the streets would enable residents to report when they see the risk of crimes tend to occur in order to deter crimes. In case that security forces are far from residential areas, citizens take a long time to report a crime. As a result, the timely intervention of police would be too late, which leads to adverse consequences.
Despite of above arguments, I am of the opinion that there are many ways to decrease the level of crime. One of effective methods is that governments can apply the technology. By installing CCTV systems, the streets will be put under control twenty four hours per day. Thus, there is no need for the presence of security forces. What other solutions which authorities could perform to tackle criminal issues is to keep the society out of disorder by developing the economy. When a huge number of job are created, the unemployment rate, which is one of main reason leading to the growth of crimes, are more likely to reduce. Therefore, people force on working to fulfil what they desire without committing crimes.
In conclusion, although extending more police on the roads is a good way to address crimes, it seems to me that alternative methods would be possible solutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-four
..., the streets will be put under control twenty four hours per day. Thus, there is no need f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve methods would be possible solutions.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82461538462 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67199192147 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563076923077 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5116127852 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194970886465 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055038167194 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428939333856 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114520266288 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249857554844 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.