In some countries, the criminal trials are shown on the TV and the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In some nations, it is a heated topic about criminal trials when it broadcasts on the television programme. Some people argue that this may trigger some negative consequences. This essay will argue why the pros of such progress overweigh the cons.
On the one hand, the judgement to criminals showed on a television programme is beneficial to the public. To begin with, this sort of TV show provide the truth of crime with informative details. This helps people to have access to knowledge about what they interested such as the law or policy. Secondly, these trials open to the public will reduce the crime rate to a certain extent because people will affair of the consequence they have to face if commit a crime. Furthermore, people may acquire practical knowledge about some particular crime. For instance, the increasing number of elderly scam has become a serious problem, if these people would watch more criminal trials related to the scam, then they might not be cheated and their damage may be avoidable.
On the other hand, the criminal judgement that broadcasts to the public may trigger a few negative consequences. Firstly, a potential criminal may break the law by gaining criminal skills through television because they think they would escape from the chasing. From my counter-argument of this statement, if these people who intend to commit a crime, they would found any information they need in this digital era. Another reason often mentioned is that the privacy of victims will be exposed and considered as a second hurt. However, according to recently advanced technology, the victim's face and voice could be marked or changed when they showed on TV.
In conclusion, although showing criminal judgements on the TV has few minor influences on the public, such TV show played an important role in current society. Personally, I strongly believe the benefits to the public overweigh the negative effect.
- In some countries the government has tried to reduce traffic For instance they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour Do you think this development is positive or negative 79
- Some people think everyone should be a vegetarian because we do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet To what extent do you agree or disagree 44
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract local people 74
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later. Some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students about the danger of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12302839117 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71633562664 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542586750789 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7853616296 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150042825084 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547455563329 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418588481746 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105098498039 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242079282681 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.