In some countries, health care is free, paid for by the state. In other countries, payment is divided between the state and people themselves. Discuss both systems, and say which one is better.
In some regions, health-related services are free of charge, whereas other countries require their citizens to pay for health care themselves. These two systems have both pros and cons, but I believe that the health system with divided payment is better.
Health care free of charge in many countries can have certain benefits. Firstly, it can provide access to free health services in impoverished areas, where people are unable to access health amenities due to financial insufficiency. This can help these poor individuals save their lives when suffering from a disease despite their poverty. Children living in the slums, for instance, can still protect their lives from certain diseases if being given immediate health care without fee. Moreover, when health services are supported financially by the government, access to medical amenities will be spreaded widely over the country. This means that every person is able to use the system regardless of financial status, which can increase the efficiency of public health care services to some extent.
Divided payment for health care is also advantageous to certain aspects. A notable advantage can be seen in terms of sufficient funding for medical purposes. When patients purchase their own treatment for some illnesses, the fees can be contributed to the funding of the general health system, which can put the government under less financial pressure. This fund can also be utilized in finding out new medicine and effective curing methods. Another benefit of this system is for the patients’ preferences. If they pay for their health services, they can select better and suitable treatment options than the standard provided by the state. Thus, their health conditions can improve significantly due to the suitability of treating methods they pay to choose.
Considering two systems, I suppose that the divided payment system is a better option since the government cannot always cover the costly fees to cure specific diseases. If the state has to endure this issue without the payment of citizens, the public health system is likely to face a financial crisis and become insufficient to the increasing demand for health care.
In conclusion, although free health services from the state can help popularize healthcare widely, especially to the poor areas and better the public health to some point, I assume that it can still cause a financial crisis if the government’s fund replenishes due to costly fees to cure a large demand and many diseases. Therefore, the system with separated payment is better by giving sufficient funding for medical purposes and allowing patients to pick the best treatment for their health conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'cares'.
Suggestion: cares
...th divided payment is better. Health care free of charge in many countries can ha...
^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...financially by the government, access to medical amenities will be spreaded widel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, as to, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2281.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31701631702 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70303014222 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3360307312 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.052631579 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300757432978 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109339564834 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728650401592 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209614408585 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695334072379 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.