In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The governments demand higher taxes on fast foods, the reason why a lot of people are suffering from health in some areas of the world. In fact, I would argue that there are many benefits from this kind of taxes for people and society.
People have used to eat fast foods to save their moneys and times. Consequently, majority of them damage from that kind of meals. There are advantages of making higher taxes on fast foods. The first and perhaps the most significant reason for increasing diseases is obesity. For example, there are plenty of albumen matter in ingredients of fast food. Consequently, it makes people fat. Secondly, a lot of fast foods are made from pork. Pork is the most harmful meat for human body and it leads to be more than 40 illnesses. Government take into consideration this kind of issues.
On the other hand, this kind of attempts may offend many bussinesmen and fast food sellers. As a result, they price their products highly in order not to make damage. Governments should direct money to health field which is raised from taxes. It would be such a beneficial movement.
All in all, the benefits of imposing a higher tax can outweight the drawbacks, provided that governments and scientists consider health before profit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e most significant reason for increasing diseases is obesity. For example, there ...
^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...equently, it makes people fat. Secondly, a lot of fast foods are made from pork. ...
^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'takes'.
Suggestion: takes
...o be more than 40 illnesses. Government take into consideration this kind of issues....
^^^^
Line 6, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... All in all, the benefits of imposing a higher tax can outweight the drawbacks...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in fact, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 216.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83796296296 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5455343978 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 506.74238477 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.542746684 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.3125 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360252706349 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105278256068 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625160549986 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20356409956 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748742413956 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.0946893788 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.