Nowadays, many issued about the medical problem are caused by junk food, and the government has the solution to change human think about junk food by including tax for it. However, both parties have their reason to the argument whether expensive junk food will give more beneficial for human or not.
To begin with, the communities, especially who live in the city, are compelled to being ready as possible. There is not enough time for people who work in the busy field. One thing that can be minimized on the people schedule is when they get a meal, and the junk food opens the solution to cut-down time. For example, the businessman has density schedule, sometimes, he forgets to get breakfast in the morning, and the junk food is readiness.
On the other hand, something which relates to the human health shall be managed, and this problem will be the government role. The tax will realize the human no to spend too much money to eat junk food, especially in the free day, because the massed shall have time to make a meal. Hopefully, by the tax, the medical problem caused by the junk food decrease to a significant number. There is some research about junk food will issue such as the minimum number of nutrient and many medical reports caused by it. This statement is supported by the data about the cancer disease increase as the same as the number of outlets that sell food in ready to eat package.
In conclusion, fast food will provide human to always eat in the business day. But, this kind of meal shall be decreased in consumption because many medical histories are caused by fast food. And the tax has the role to realize the human about this danger.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rning, and the junk food is readiness. On the other hand, something which relat...
^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...nt role. The tax will realize the human no to spend too much money to eat junk foo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64646464646 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32923150671 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6412447187 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5714285714 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244213796288 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950006205472 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418924047449 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158301443387 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505030367264 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.