In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people research this?
These days, the young generation has had an interest in getting to know about the history of the house they live in. There are various reasons behind this tendency, and I will suggest the appropriate ways for the research process.
Many defenses explain why people are interested in knowing the past, and many buildings have a previously significant purpose. First and foremost, people might know about condition, structure, and events of their houses to guarantee their safety in daily activities and lives. As a result, they can evaluate the condition of living space and make plans for future maintenance and preparation in advance. Furthermore, people can get knowledge about historical events and purposes, such as many buildings in Vietnam that have some historical significance as they served as medical camps or recruitment points during the World War. Therefore, youngsters can arouse their interest in getting information and passing it down to the next generations to prevent them from being on the verge of disappearance.
It seems to me that asking the old generations and searching on the Internet are the best ways to access the history of the apartment and house. Firstly, the most useful way to investigate the past of the building is by using the Internet, which can support by a prominent tool for people living anywhere. With some clicks on the screen, people can learn about the construction stages and occurrences of its structure and event. Nevertheless, getting in touch with an expert who can be a historian or an architect to narrate the type or architectural design utilized in building the structure.
In conclusion, there are no arguments about the meanings of research in the past accommodation. Furthermore, using the correct measurements to find is also important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ropriate ways for the research process. Many defenses explain why people are int...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18556701031 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9509637742 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584192439863 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1918105129 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.076923077 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316211920613 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980360939056 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476884969598 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173379053527 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617592031628 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.