Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
With the development of advanced technology, people have had a higher standard of living, but youngsters tend to spend a lot of time using electronic devices, especially smartphones. Several reasons explain this tendency, and I believe that it triggers many adverse effects on their well-being and study.
There are various reasons why it takes children hours to use smartphones. It relates to the development of high technology, which helps children with studying and entertainment. Firstly, smartphones can be an assistant tool for learning; for instance, they can search for information and documents, take notes directly on applications such as Word, and they also can learn online through devices. As a result, they consume various time on mobile phones. Moreover, smartphones contain various entertaining programs which is a great way of relaxing and relieving stress after working or studying. The time using smartphones escalates unstoppable without control.
It seems to me that the excessive use of smartphones exerts many adverse influences on youngsters. First and foremost, kids may suffer from the risk of heart disease and high obesity created by a sedentary lifestyle and lack of physical and mental activities when they spend much time in front of the smartphone's screen. Nevertheless, children are easily influenced by toxic activity and brainwashed by misconceptions when using smartphones, especially accessing social media. The time using smartphones escalates unstoppable without parental control.
In conclusion, many factors, including a new emphasis on online learning, the dominance of online interactions, and the lack of parental surveillance, increase the time youngsters use smartphones. I view the trend as deleterious to physical health and study at school for children.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67158671587 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15426288183 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605166051661 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9102779789 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.785714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127377614403 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046750486222 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360959378902 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729757150161 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335422783289 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67158671587 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15426288183 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605166051661 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9102779789 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.785714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127377614403 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046750486222 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360959378902 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729757150161 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335422783289 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.