In some countries, online shopping is now replacing shopping in stores. Do you think it is a negative or positive development?
In some areas around the world, the existence of conventional stores is being highly threated by online commerce. I believe this development brings positive effects to people.
This new shopping method helps individuals get used to computer technology. Since the introduction of e-commerce, customers, especially older shoppers, have been continually encouraged to get accustomed to using the internet. More specifically, online customers can master search engines such as Google to find products’ information and reviews. Gradually, people’s skill in using computers and the internet will be significantly enhanced. Take my grandfather for example, ever since his first t-shirt purchase from a website, he has been enabled to explore anything via Google search.
Moreover, time consumption is vastly reduced when buying from online stores. While it takes some time to travel to a local shop, people can now quickly open their favorite site and start browsing products in a few seconds. My colleagues usually do this during recess as they do not have enough time to visit any storefronts. Ultimately, they always have their items paid then shipped by Amazon after five minutes.
Lastly, prices of products are made greatly cheaper compared to items sold in conventional stores. Thanks to the incredibly affordable cost of maintaining a website, shop owners can sell their merchandise half the initial prices and still turn a marginal profit. For instance, most online dealers sell a Fitbit smartwatch for 149 USD, while storefront owners still have to stick with the price of 249 USD. Both ways of selling earn distributors 50 USD a piece.
In conclusion, the fact that e-commerce is radically dominating traditional storefronts is a positive development as it promotes the advancement of technology as well as helps save people’s precious time and money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, still, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49310344828 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01226387463 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686206896552 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9400148277 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171100574495 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486790195086 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412472567315 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881696216275 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414631931631 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.