In some countries, owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people.Why might this be the case.Do you think it is a positive or negative situation.
In some countries, there are those who maintain that house ownership is more important house renting. From my persepective, this phenonmenon have both positives and negatives in equal measures..
First of all there are various reasons why homeownership is more preferred . One reason is that this might deprive from common belief about housing. For instannce, in Eastern nation, it is commonly believed that a person must own a house. In some cases, this can also be a mandatory task, or a lifetime achievement. Another reason is that house owners are looking for long term investment in estate. This is due to the fact that the value of land is likely to increase in the future. In other words, an increase in the value of the land means that owners will gain more profit when sold.Therefore, they place great importance on owning a house.
Regarding its positive aspects, there are several benefits in owning a house. First of all, it can provide a stable shelter, where people can feel a sense of security, boosting one's housing satisfaction. Secondly, an owned house can be used by subsequent generations. This not only save the cost of buying a house but also the time looking for a house. However there are also risks associated with house ownership. The greatest challenge facing house owners is taxes. Taxes are levied on house owners based on the value of the land itself and the properties kept in the house. In some cases, the tax can be prohibitely high, making it impossible for the payers. This can lead to the house being foreclosed,and its owner fall in the state of homelessness. Furthermore, the increasing demand for home ownership can result in housing shortage( not enough supplied lands). This can drive up the cost of owning or renting a house, making it become more inaccessible.
In sum, the reasons for house ownership vary, ranging from people's common idea to long term profit.. Although, there are several positive aspects in this phenonmenon; however its negativity must not be neglected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ositives and negatives in equal measures.. First of all there are various reasons...
^^
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sons why homeownership is more preferred . One reason is that this might deprive f...
^^
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... owners will gain more profit when sold.Therefore, they place great importance on owning ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... can feel a sense of security, boosting ones housing satisfaction. Secondly, an owne...
^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... but also the time looking for a house. However there are also risks associated with ho...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...s can lead to the house being foreclosed,and its owner fall in the state of homeless...
^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... peoples common idea to long term profit.. Although, there are several positive as...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95280235988 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74014591837 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536873156342 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0271578793 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.3181818182 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4090909091 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18007681868 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571459157104 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377290522277 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12550240302 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111619646982 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.