In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
People in many different countries and cultures have a strong belief in a stable life, which can be reflected by owning a house. There are some reasons behind this concept, and personally, I believe it would not be beneficial to the economy.
The main reason for this social phenomenon is that possessing a house would bring a strong sense of stability to the house owners. To prove this way of explanation, many people believe that a house could be saved as a potential mortgage in the future. Since the land area cannot be expanded anymore, the house built on a specific area of land will become more and more valuable as time goes by. Hence, spending a great amount of money on a house could be a smart investment for the future. Once owned, a house could be kept for a while until the owner seizes the chance to sell it for a good price.
From my perspective, I strongly believe that the real estate phenomenon could negatively affect the economy for some reason. One is that the house’s price can increase drastically because of the sense of owning a house. That being said, since a house could be an ideal investment, more and more people are likely to hunt for land and build a house there. Therefore, the price of houses will increase according to the law of the market. Moreover, despite unstoppable rising house prices, more and more people are becoming unable to afford a house, especially the unemployed. As a result, apparently, people will choose to rent a house weekly or monthly. Undoubtedly, this decision would not be a good long-term investment, but with their modest budget, this could be the best they could do.
All things considered, I claim that people should not prioritize owning a house since the economy and people’s budgets would not benefit from it. Instead, people should be mindful of considering their account in order to decide to either rent or own a house.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
People in many different countries and cultures have a strong be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72891566265 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56897164811 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515060240964 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.7842338083 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21333233242 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805910413461 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412474109323 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14833029958 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249749720283 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.