In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
Individuals all around the world especially in developed countries have usually preferred owning a house to renting one. This issue has had several reasons such as declining their stress about future which will be explained later. Also people’s desires to having houses has affected in both positive and negative way in the society.
To commence with, the main cause of people’s requirement to buy a house could be the fear of changes in their future. Humans particularly who have enlarged their family for example they have recently given birth to a child, have had more concerns. These worries could range from losing their jobs, their child’s future. So for these reasons they have always been fond of owning a house in order to reduce even a little bit of their anxiety for if anything went wrong in the upcoming years. Consequently, human-beings have had a definite right to be worried about their future so they have had a keen to own as many properties as they could afford to buy.
In addition, this issue has had both adverse and worthy effects on societies. Although by buying houses people could feel more relaxed, they could end up being extremely worrying. This is because of the fact which has propelled individuals to work harder in order to earn much amount of money to be able to afford buying houses. As a result, if their job did not paid enough money, they would be devastated. Moreover, their concerns have been affected by their horrible conditions in society such as bad economy where they have felt, if they do not buy a house in near future, they will not be able to afford buying it anymore. This could lead them to be more anxious and heighten the possibility to lose their job situation.
In conclusion, not only people with low payments, but also with high satisfied salary have been content to have a house. Their demands have been because of their comfort of their lives’ later days. Furthermore, even though this has led them not to be worried, it may make them more anxious at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...t future which will be explained later. Also people’s desires to having houses has a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...wning a house in order to reduce even a little bit of their anxiety for if anything went w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to buy'.
Suggestion: to buy
...ch amount of money to be able to afford buying houses. As a result, if their job did n...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'pay'
Suggestion: pay
...uses. As a result, if their job did not paid enough money, they would be devastated....
^^^^
Line 5, column 610, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to buy'.
Suggestion: to buy
...future, they will not be able to afford buying it anymore. This could lead them to be ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77401129944 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43737352158 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539548022599 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5484922914 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4117647059 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8235294118 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135875498208 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554706123999 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331023871795 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101400298124 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479593513607 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.