Reusing commodities instead of purchasing new ones is a global trend nowadays. This phenomenon certainly has more advantages than disadvantages, which will be discussed in this essay, making it a positive development.
First of all, by using second-hand items, there has been a huge impact on consumerism. In today's world where everyone is a victim of markets, reusing things has helped us to get out of this consumerist society. Secondly, using refurbished commodities has the biggest positive impact on the environment. The less the people dump the used items, the lesser the environment is damaged. It helps to make the surroundings clean. This is evident from an article published in The New York times in 2017, which stated that when people started to reutilize things, the amount pollution went down remarkably, about 60 percent. Moreover, it helps people to save money and spend it on the things that actually have some significance, rather than just wasting on buying newer products.
Despite all those pros, using second-hand items has few unignorable drawbacks. When people buy less new items, markets may collapse. This can lead to a huge economical loss at national level. There might also be the case that factories cease to make any innovation or improvements in products. Furthermore, second-hand items have no warranty, so, if any product is found damaged, it might not be changed. Reused products often have less reliability than the newer ones and might have less working life.
To summarise, although there are few cons of this trend, yet the advantages are much more in number and significance. Thus, it can be concluded that usage of second-hand things is a positive trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...s may collapse. This can lead to a huge economical loss at national level. There might als...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88254639581 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1991740058 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2352941176 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275271028166 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772416613133 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579076760057 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172894303466 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454516172018 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.