Nowadays some people tend to take temporary jobs for they have the time to do other things Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages
One of the major trends going on in this world is having a Part-time job, particularly jobs requiring to work only for a few months per annum. The innumerable advantages of working for a short period of time drive people to it. Despite all the benefits of this trend, there are some notable drawbacks that should be considered.
Beginning with the positive aspects, it is clear that temporary jobs offers independence to a person. Although this can also be achieved by working in a regular job, one thing that differs the two is the absence of monotony of working life in the former one. Moreover, it provides a sense of relaxation to a person, which might not be easily achieved by working regularly. Odd-jobs also make switching the workplace easier. For example, if a person finds a job boring or unsuitable according to his capability, he can switch to other kind of job as the previous one was irregular. A person can also take out time to take part in other activities if he is working part time.
Nevertheless, there are some undesirable effects of irregular jobs. Although it provides the opportunity to change jobs, instability of working life can cause stress issues. A person is under constant tension about wage security, as odd job workers get paid less than the regular ones, and they are always at the verge of getting expelled under unexpected circumstances. Furthermore, the probability of getting promoted of very low for irregular workers as most of companies want full time workers in their organisation.
Overall, while having a part time job is undeniably beneficial, the drawbacks is similarly clear. But in this instance, it seems that the cons are outweighed by the pros.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
...t-time job, particularly jobs requiring to work only for a few months per annum. The in...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rable advantages of working for a short period of time drive people to it. Despite all the ben...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...rt in other activities if he is working part time. Nevertheless, there are some undesi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the companies') or simply say ''most companies''.
Suggestion: most of the companies; most companies
...ed of very low for irregular workers as most of companies want full time workers in their organis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...gular workers as most of companies want full time workers in their organisation. Over...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ganisation. Overall, while having a part time job is undeniably beneficial, the drawb...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92361111111 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83455005193 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6565504008 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223479272716 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721072717606 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502484574345 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131269795094 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419832929284 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.