In some countries, people spend long hours at work. Why does this happen? Is it positive or negative development?
Recently, a long-hour working culture has become a trend in the workplace in some countries. The causes of it often come from both the company side and the employee side. In my opinion, it is a negative tendency.
The development of long working hours is in charge of institutions and workers. Firstly, we have already known that the company's prosperity relies almost on the productivity of employees. As many working hours, they can take, as much valuation they can create. The company increases working hours to maintain the worker's productivity to keep the profit raise as high as possible. Secondly, the employees want to boost their career opportunities, which means they can promote to a higher level, gain lucrative salaries. Spending much time at work, they want to demonstrate their job sacrification the progressive attitude. The worker who willingly burns the midnight oil at work, the boss will consider for promotion.
However, it is an entirely adverse development. Employees who work extended work hours are likely to have detrimental physical problems and mental health effects. Working long hours can take a toll on our physical health. The lengthy periods of sedentary behavior will increase the risk of heart problems such as coronary heart diseases. Various well-conducted research has said employees who were sedentary for more than 13 hours a day were twice as likely to die prematurely as those inactive for 11.5 hours. Furthermore, a long-hour working culture has an adverse effect on our cognitive abilities; clearly, it is the cognitive impairment in young people. Secondly, workers who spend long hours at work are highly at risk of mental health deterioration. Excessive working hours may result in a problem with close relationships, which in turn may trigger depression.
To sum up, we both consider the motivation and disadvantages result which long working hours have created. The worker should consider work-life balance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...increases working hours to maintain the workers productivity to keep the profit raise a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30868167203 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92027982269 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565916398714 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5431065944 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.55 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.55 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256134189736 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853779686389 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766953048994 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155036565612 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252483308185 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.