It is obvious that, more and more stores are tented to organize in rural areas. This trend brings both advantages and drawbacks for people and also for the using private vehicles behaviors.
The tendency that people prefer using the private vehicles such as car and motorbikes for shopping increases higher, because many stores are decided to construct and develop its business in suburban areas. For many people, using car to move out of town brings more disadvantages than benefits. Because when demanding in using car rises rapidly, people will have to expense more money for transportation like buying and maintaining their vehicles. Compared with shopping in cities centers where citizens can use public transport to transfer from their home to stores, driving a long way for shopping in rural areas takes more money for extra expenses. Secondly, increasing car demand will lead to affect to the environment. For instance, transportation has been a main cause in climate change, therefore, using more private cars will cause pressure for environment and decrease air quality.
On the other hand, there are many people like using private cars for moving, it helps boost the economic development. To be specific, rising car production and assembling sectors due to increasing car demands will contribute more benefits to their economies. Take some developed and developing countries as example, some countries such as Germany, Japan and China, producing and consuming private cars are crucial sectors. Moreover, developing car productions also require the governments to improve and develop the traffic infrastructures. If the governments invest more money to repair and create new roads, it will change the cities images and may also attract more tourists both domestic and overseas which develop tourism sector.
In conclusion, although increasing car demands which brings so many benefits for people is the cause of moving more stores out of town, but some others still argue that some drawbacks will outweigh advantages in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3800623053 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6867745685 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551401869159 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9949508399 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.357142857 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246887141931 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939434442434 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635566515068 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156551646123 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701312314184 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.