In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In this day and age, the ever-increasing demand for a better lifestyle has engendered a trend of driving beyond the vicinity of a town with a view to approaching more ideal shopping centers’, resulting in an escalation of car use and a bitter decline in in-town shops figures. This essay attempts to give plausible reasoning on why the disadvantages clearly outweigh the advantages of such a creative yet deleterious shopping trend.
Traveling beyond the vicinity of a town with the pursuit of supposedly better consumables, without a doubt, is highly constructive when it comes to residential allocation. To be specific, such a change might grant developing areas opportunities towards dwellers’ recognition. As a result, this trend engenders supportive provision for a more balanced procedure of population distribution.
However, such a change in shop locations might be a looming threat to both local authority and the dwellers in general. To commence with, driving to out-of-town markets is a huge waste of dwellers’ time. In the long run, the joy of going shopping would be replaced by incessant boredom coming from unnecessarily tiring processes of traveling. As a matter of fact, the time spent on driving to such shopping centers could be devoted to activities that actually facilitate a person’s self-development such as reading books, taking up a hobby or working on assignments. Adding further, the excessive use of cars from local residents would lead to an increase in environmental contamination, a problem that has already struck social activists since the day it emerged.
All in all, purchasers driving out of town for better markers, despite its slight benefit in residential distribution, pose immense threats to local authorities and inhabitants when it comes to environmental pollution and time-waste.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, well, in general, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44405594406 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31997195774 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6252984626 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.545454545 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207372157492 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730705471782 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692560967864 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121277837021 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413060549661 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.