Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, companies are exploring various avenues to promote their company as well as their products. A compelling measure is to provide facilities for local communities. What will be more effective is the support of many people who thinks it is a good initiative. In this essay, I will explain why it is a dynamic approach.
At present times, people are always swamped with responsibilities, both in professional and personal life, such that they do not get time to actively participate in communal activities. If the companies organize different sports and social events in communities, it will give these people a scope to engage themselves in fun activities. It will act as a hiatus from a boring life. They will get to communicate with each other and develop amicable relationships. Moreover, if the companies promote such activities regularly, young talents will come up as they participate in the facilities. They will get an opportunity to come into the limelight and showcase their expertise. Some of them may even be signed by the companies to promote their products as brand ambassadors. In this way, the community will be assisted to develop their youngsters along with enjoying the company of their neighbors.
If the companies take up this event successfully, they will be profited as well. They will be able to reach out to more people and uphold their goods. For example, when a sports company organizes a football match where it uses its own products, the players and youngsters will be able to use these and later go on to buy them for personal use. It will be free publicity. Besides, their good cause will be appreciated in the society and the value of their stuff and stocks will increase as more people will show interest in them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94932432432 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8880511721 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547297297297 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0881508314 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1764705882 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146682324535 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543794912319 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566932726934 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120994336049 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517425263586 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.