Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that big enterprises should have a responsibility to provide sports and social facilities for the local residents. Personally, I believe that government should play a role in supporting
On the one hand, although it is not compulsory big companies ought to invest money in the local community due to huge finances. This may help them to market their brand as well as their reasonable action towards residents, helping their nation be more developed and more civilized. In addition, in some countries, particularly in the countryside which people don’t have the condition to work because of their health problems and lack of nutrients. This may lead to a heavy consequence to manpower, although the population in recent years plays a key role in economic advancement and the technology industry. Therefore, if companies want to remain great quality employment, starting to put money into sports and social facilities is necessary and inevitable.
On the other hand, letting companies solve the problems lonely would be unfair unless there has cooperation between the government. It is clear that the residents' pay for taxes, charges, fees would transfer to government revenue. Besides investing in housing, schools, and hospitals, sport and social facilities have the same priority to meet the need of citizens. Thus, governments are willing to pay for those facilities unless the revenue would be useless and perhaps, corruption will happen. This may help those countries have a positive image internationally and increase the satisfaction level of citizens.
In conclusion, although big companies are encouraged to pay for sports and social facilities, the responsibility belongs mainly to the government to invest effectively from residents’ money. Then it would actually solve the problem in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ernment should play a role in supporting On the one hand, although it is not comp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42456140351 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02747447943 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5208864614 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.923076923 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233620070745 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818571650503 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093894688053 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159731197809 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075823666453 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.