Today family members do not eat meals together. Why? Is this a positive or a negative trend?
While in the previous period, sitting together and having meals was an essential part for every family’s members to discuss incidents that happened, nowadays young generations have a tendency not to maintain this culture anymore. Personally, this development is negative in the majority of aspects which have extremely threatened the family's relationship.
It is clear that not having meals together would bring about various drawbacks for a list of reasons. Most notably, the cohesion between family members would deteriorate. First of all, in particular, parents do not have circumstances to keep track of their children’s conditions, physically and mentally. In modern days, the ongoing expansion of the Internet promotes such a technological life, which can be a risk. Teenagers, with a range of occasions to access the Internet, can easily be led to dangerous situations. Moreover, without parents’ caringness, teenagers do not have the ability to get out of this danger.
Secondly, having meals separately establishes an isolation-thought in their minds. In other words, doing so can damage teenagers’ confidence and weaken the emotional bond with each other, particularly in young generations. Little by little, it poses immense psychological issues to their children when they do not acquire appropriate care. Moreover, children gradually prefer to have their meals alone, even in a social context. As a result, they will struggle to encounter opportunities to expand their social circle, keep track of both inside and outside information, or improve their chances of promotion, which is really gainful in work environments.
In conclusion, not having meals together can totally promise detrimental effects, especially children. Humans’ connection and mental health, which should be specially concerned in teenagers’ growing progress, can be deteriorated intensely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bers to discuss incidents that happened, nowadays young generations have a tenden...
^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is really gainful in work environments. In conclusion, not having meals together...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.775 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16669329563 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646428571429 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4353753515 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17664268983 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606290863674 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513081089226 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111659225615 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610245272799 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.