Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there was a general consensus that large-scale corporations should raise fund for the resident to buy sports and social facilities. I totally agree with this opinion as I believe that this not also help the companies gain more sympathy hence attracting more customers but also improving the living standard of this area.
In terms of the benefits of the company, I completely advocate them to allocate recreational facilities for the local because this action can leave a great impression in other’s eyes and accordingly increase the revenue of the corporation, plus, it can be seen as an effective way to make their brand become more well-known in the society. For example, the Panasonic, a global corporation, has a specific department called corporate social responsibility that supports the local community, earning it a strong humanitarian reputation.
Moreover, the execution of this strategy is likely to benefit the local community greatly. Being equipped by many instruments enables them to have a convenient life and improve physical health. The majority of people at present are more likely to avoid taking part in sport activities because they can not afford to the fee of the gym or have a suitable schedule, that why If the companies sponsored them these devices, they would be able to have flexible time to do exercise without any cost.
In conclusion, I completely agree that the large dealerships should support the local with sports facilities as it not only enhances the profit of the investor but also improve the living standard for citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
Nowadays, there was a general consensus that large-scale corporations should r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consensus that large-scale corporations should raise fund for the resident to bu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89810554728 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.8292671705 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.75 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.875 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198396282398 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825812164994 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508803908436 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118998533085 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352998460576 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.