The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart illustrates the passenger kilometers which commuter traveled by six different transports in 1990 and 2000. Overall, the figure for buses and rail outnumbered that for others and the total number of kilometers in two years is over 100, moreover, while the figure of people using buses, trains, planes and total experienced upswings, the opposite was true for bicycles and motorbikes
Starting with 1990. The number of passenger kilometers traveled by buses was nearly 45 billion, which was the highest in comparison to about 5 billion of bicycles and planes. The second rank in terms of popular belonged to trains with 40 billion and the total number of five transports in this year was 100 billion.
Moving to 2000. The similar pattern can be seen for the quantity of individuals using bicycles and motorbikes with an eligible decrease. There was a marginally growth to nearly 50 billion passenger kilometers of buses. Furthermore, the respective numbers of those who used trains and in total had risen to 50 billion and 115 billion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ite was true for bicycles and motorbikes Starting with 1990. The number of passen...
^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('marginally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('growth') instead of another adjective.
...s with an eligible decrease. There was a marginally growth to nearly 50 billion passenger kilomete...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08092485549 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68115890072 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4261378818 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107146429546 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682805643638 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955714224194 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772906416534 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395095057611 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.