In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
Today, citizens have adopted a habit to go to shopping centers based on the outskirts, therefore, many smaller stores in the urban areas are on the brink of bankruptcy. Despite several drawbacks presented along the scheme, I insist that the merits of this are more impactful than the shortcomings.
On the one hand, negative effects of out-of-town stores consist of environmental and economic problems. The first hardship is that it could cause significant damage to a city’s economy. If habitants no longer prefer to go shopping in the central shops, these shops are easily exposed with closure. Consequently, huge numbers of workers are likely to lose their occupations. Moreover, increased bankruptcies among small town-center shops put the locals in considerable inconvenience, primarily those not in possession of a private car standing on the most affects. As a result, a rise in car usage for the demand of travelling long distances is apparent, therefore cause critical environmental issues such as contaminated water source and infected soil due to vehicles’ gas emission.
On the other hand, the large shops which are out of town can bring numerous positive impacts to both the rural and metropolitan areas. First to mention, out-of-town stores presents career paths for the local of the outskirts. Thus, people have boosted living conditions relying on better income from jobs in the shopping malls. For instance, in the span of a decade, Ha Donghas developed from a poorly advanced area to a top valued habitat owing to the establishment of modern-day mega malls. Secondly, such changes in people’s shopping habit and preference encourage a move to out-of-city area for settlement. Lastly, various metropolises, including Hanoi or Ho Chi Minh City have been dealing with the dramatic growth in population number. In consequence, residents’ move to the outskirts helps to reduce the pressure on not only housing systems but also the traffic congestion.
In conclusion, although the trend of shopping in larger stores located far away from the city centrals have several negative effects, I would argue that the favorable aspects of this trend outweigh the adverse ones on behalf of the stores’ ability to help solve some problems in the modern cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31491712707 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94398422729 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640883977901 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8210029917 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.25 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0625 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275338762817 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762194554979 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699939439601 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137478830863 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624252031859 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.