Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour.
Currently several governments have established prohibited rules for smoking cigarettes in business centers and cafes, whereas other states are not likely to think about this issue. This essay will highlight pros and cons of both views and will explain why discrimination of rights is not an escape for the society.
On one hand, smoking along with alcohol and drugs are harmful for the person’s health. However, in case of tobacco it could be dangerous for the surrounding people, which is called passive smoking. Doctors tend to claim that ash from the cigarette is more hazardous for non-smokers rather than for who smokeRs.Opponents of public smoking accentuate on the widely-held concern that smoking might be a cause of heart diseases and lung cancer. Moreover, in some cultures it appears to be unacceptable by religious reasons. For instance, most of Arab Muslims countries condemn smoking as it is forbidden in Quran to make actions that contribute to destruction. Thus this example shows the case where nations pursue the particular ethics and ethnic distinction.
By contrast, supporters of human rights stress on the fact of freedom for people activity and choice, meaning that for smokers there can be special areas, nevertheless, the general ban on smoking should consider discriminating a part of community. In addition, perhaps the major factor for the allowing tobacco use seems to be an increase of the governmental economic income from this business structure. If the consumption of tobacco rose inside of the country, this state would be more attractive for the international tobacco companies. Consequently, such giants as Philip Morris and British American Tobacco suppose starting to build plants, and the government is provided by increased funds into economy due to the high taxation. This may well affect ON the whole development of the nation and leads TO the improvement in social life of the folk.
Overall, It is logical to conclude that while it may be correct to prevent smoking by restriction in publicity, it still appears that the government has strong benefits from the tobacco trade. It seems that smoking cigarettes is remained AS A personal OPT of every individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | angellica | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | ahmadrava88 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | nguyenana611 | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | nguyenana611 | 78 | view |
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 70
- Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects 84
- All children should learn to speak a foreign language as soon as they start school. how far do you agree with this proposal? How important is it for a child to learn a foreign language? 89
- It is sometimes said that the countryside offers a high quality of life, especially for families. What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside, for example as farmers? What is your own view about this? 84
- The chart below shows participation in certain leisure activities by children in Australia 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hts is not an escape for the society. On one hand, smoking along with alcohol ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...zardous for non-smokers rather than for who smokeRs.Opponents of public smoking acc...
^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Opponents
...non-smokers rather than for who smokeRs.Opponents of public smoking accentuate on the wid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 663, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...actions that contribute to destruction. Thus this example shows the case where natio...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icular ethics and ethnic distinction. By contrast, supporters of human rights ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 750, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...due to the high taxation. This may well affect ON the whole development of the nation and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...provement in social life of the folk. Overall, It is logical to conclude that ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that smoking cigarettes is remained AS A personal OPT of every individual.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28248587571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92997640304 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5380708524 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160420689263 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519854938976 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256306698971 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943251947056 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029481232524 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.