Some observers say that police officers should be recruited from the communities where they work, so that they have local knowledge. Other people say that this is unnecessary, or even undesirable. Where do You stand on this debate? Is local knowledge essential in modern policing?
Several experts claim that it is appropriate for policemen recruiting to engage them from the citizens of the city where they will work, whereas others reckon that it is unacceptable. This essay will examine the question and provide evidences against the support of the statement.
First of all, it is true that local people are more aware OF geography and manners of the city, which is applicable in seeking FOR and prosecution of the criminals. Secondly, they could have some weight/BURDEN among dwellers due to their previous work or life and consequently influence on the habitats in a right way. Moreover, there is no extra-funding of relocation and living for employees and their family for the government to hire citizens.
On the other hand, in modern digital world fewer and fewer crimes are committed on the streets. Contemporary offenders are hackers and frauders, who do identity theft and hack security system of the business corporations and banks. Hence, it seems that the local knowledge are not sufficient for the investigators. Furthermore, the examples of the different countries around the world, either developed or developing, demonstrate the corruption in the government and it is likely to say that background relationships of the officers may lead to the deterioration of the situation and bribery. Finally, despite of the SHEER expenses of recruitinG people from other places, they might possess actual and excellent skills for this kind of labor, resulting in decrease of the crime rate and training other local workers for their superior performance in THE future.
It is logical to conclude that even though choosing candidates for the police from the citizens have a number of advantages, there are some considerable featureS, which should not be boundED to the local-oriented approach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...against the support of the statement. First of all, it is true that local peop...
^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... consequently influence on the habitats in a right way. Moreover, there is no extra-funding of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the government to hire citizens. On the other hand, in modern digital wor...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r superior performance in THE future. It is logical to conclude that even thou...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, kind of, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31724137931 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98219847242 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4394776592 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.181818182 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3636363636 7.06120827912 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271668041098 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811136280681 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581494374068 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147148793188 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338864557727 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.