The best way to educate children is not using the Internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children?
Some people are likely to consider that avoiding usage of the Internet on the lessons is the most effective methods to teach kids. However, there could be different options for the efficacy of the education.
It is probably true that banning the online network for children at school is a rational measure as they do not distract on the social media sites and chats with friends. Nevertheless, on closer inspection the idea to prohibit anything which is deterioratING —— the process is not an appropriate way to solve the problem. Moreover, these actions appear to contribute to the unacceptable patterns of students’ behaviour such as truancy and disrespect to the elders.
Turning to the possible alternatives, perhaps the more productive educational improvements in schooling may be the ongoing training for the tutors which enhances the effectiveness of their teacher-led lessons and their appealing authority beyond the pupils. Another viable opportunity to educate youngsters would be to encourage their autonomous learning skills working under the supervision. Despite of the using the Internet in this case, they could study to synthesise and assimilate knowledge as well as to sift the information and discriminate between sources in data-gathering. All of these steps will be more powerful for their further education in universities rather than restrictED conditions.
Overall, it is logical to conclude that the open-ended developing approach in schooling tends to have more benefits than outdated techniques of the upbringing and teaching of the children in the form of forbiddance or limit in utilization of something.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns for the efficacy of the education. It is probably true that banning the onl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...truancy and disrespect to the elders. Turning to the possible alternatives, pe...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es rather than restrictED conditions. Overall, it is logical to conclude that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, as to, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54940711462 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14544053908 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1358476428 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.4 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175863672881 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557080066048 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032842175425 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872887186475 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291122218862 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.