The best way to educate children in by using the internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children?
It is believed by some societies that the internet is the best method to teach children in every course. Personally, i disagree with this argument, and there are other techniques which i will describe below.
Perhaps, the main reason for this is that existence of the internet will disturb the environment of learners in school, and they cannot focus to the lesson. It is because they tend to access contents which is unrelated with lesson, such as electronic comic, novel and watching movie. Even they can easily access game online which causes they becoming addicted. These activities will diminish enthusiasm of students to study. In addition, school needs much money to get access to the internet. For instance, in Indonesia, average of schools spend around $ 3,000.00 to buy tools which are used to connect the internet, and monthly cost of quota is about $ 1,000.00. This circumstance will affect to cost of education which causes pupils difficult to pursue their education. Moreover, it can be seen clearly that study by using the internet can effect to social life because this concept virtually use face-to-face study by using social media. In other word, interaction between each learner is limit.
I do understand the proponent views who say that existence of the internet is crucial and most effective method to teach children. Nevertheless, i feel that this concept is inefficient for children because they tend to abuse the content of internet, such as access negative content.
Of course, there are also other possible option, including doing more and more practice for student. By direct practice, children will be faster to understand a lesson because they will obt an experience directly. For example, in Australia, students also learn in outdoor or nature. By doing this, participants can directly explain real forms of plant and animal. Other effective way is providing study club. This concept will trigger social interaction each student. By this method, learners can study to build a team in social environment which is vital to improve social mindset of students.
To sum up, it seems that presence of the internet is likely ineffective to teach students, since it will bother concentration of students, high cost and effect to social interaction. On the one side, there are several methods to educate children, such as providing lots of practice and study club in classroom
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...h children in every course. Personally, i disagree with this argument, and there ...
^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...t, and there are other techniques which i will describe below. Perhaps, the ma...
^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$3'.
Suggestion: $3
...onesia, average of schools spend around $ 3,000.00 to buy tools which are used to c...
^^^
Line 3, column 653, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$1'.
Suggestion: $1
...net, and monthly cost of quota is about $ 1,000.00. This circumstance will affect t...
^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...method to teach children. Nevertheless, i feel that this concept is inefficient f...
^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: there are other; there are also
...access negative content. Of course, there are also other possible option, including doing more a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, of course, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17692307692 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67370184182 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.870580923 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7727272727 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251275491154 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715837899068 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049334803239 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147047942001 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328387182038 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.