In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.
Having a gap year after finishing the college admission of not is a significant social issue which are concerned by vast majority of high school students. Without exception, like any problems, this has 2 sides for people to make a discussion. In my view, I strongly support young people who choose to work or travel for a year before starting the university will get more life experience.
Mentioning about the benefits of having a gap year brings to, receiving life experience should not be forgotten. Attending university is not the only way to gain knowledge. To adapt to the fourth industrial revolution, young people have to diversify learning methods as learning life skill from work. Specifically, youngsters can improve their communication skill and their confidence. In additionally, by travelling, adolescents have chance observe unique culture in various countries.
In contrast, there is an argument that youth is the age which has the highest learning ability. Thus, youngster should start university studies after they just finish their high school. In fact, science proves that learning ability decrease with age. So that, if we stop learning in a year, it will be challenge when we get back to school environment. Moreover, we can feel lost by seeing people of your age update status in their college.
In brief, having a year to travel or work before register to go to university gains more positive impact if we have a specific schedule in this year. Meanwhile, let the time passed without purpose will waste your youth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, while, in addition, in brief, in contrast, in fact, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1185770751 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80225725473 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2843530462 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287050594037 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808353355033 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829443812667 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172211223234 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906241939944 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.