Nowadays, in this competitive world, circumstance of continuing graduation after high school is one of the most prominent challenges for educational planners. There are several significant debates about beneficial and detrimental effects of one year distance between high school and university among social experts.
Some social researchers are unanimous in profitable consequences of this gap. They insist that in this year young students can increase their experiences by traveling or work undoubtedly. Comprehensive investigations in U.S. illustrated that in more than two third of cases, students` motivation and innovation for continuing education increased sharply. Actually, by passing this period they can distinguish their interests for future education properly. Most of social experts believe that during this landmark year majority of students discover their fundamental talents to improve and distribute them. According to recent reports in some famous universities in England, more than 60% of students decided to alter their previous choice in graduation after this distance and it made them more successful in new way.
On the other hand some educational planners argue that because of creating delay, this phenomenon caused to decreasing students` efficiency in their university years. They emphasize that in most countries students commence their graduation immediately after their high school. These experts think that although one year gap has some available results for students, they can`t rectify that missed year in their future education. Recent researches in undeveloped countries in Asia revealed that because of the lack of appropriate plans for this year after high school, the number of students who were reluctant to continue their education grew slightly after accomplishment of this idea in these countries.
In conclusion, devising some applicable plans for students in the year between high school and university leads some useful results for them. In my point of view, pursuing some strategic attitudes in this important year causes to increasing students` creative performance in their lifestyle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, so, third, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87301587302 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0408555903 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6559202481 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261829592083 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105368384866 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597573282399 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182503066297 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252804388277 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.