Some educationalists think that international exchange visits will benefit teenagers at the school. To what extent do the advantages outweight the disadvantages.
Nowadays, international exchange visits have become increasingly popular. Some educational specialists believe that these visits will benefit the young people at schools. Although being abroad for an exchange program might cost teenagers and expose them to unwanted behaviors, it helps adolescents extend their horizons and enrich their personality development. In my opinion, the advantages surpass the disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are some drawbacks for teenage students while participating in international exchange visits. Firstly, those programs could burden their financial status since they may be expensive and require several expenses. Secondly, young students are easily affected by their surroundings, resulted in learning some behaviors which might be undesired in their cultures and traditions. For example, a study suggests that 50% of teenagers, who have been in exchange visits, have been wrongly affected during their journey. Consequently, there are possible reasons why such visits are considered disadvantageous.
On the other hand, many significant advantages could be acquired from international exchange visits. Being overseas in a foreign country could help and encourage high school students to broaden their knowledge as well as learn about different cultures and languages. Moreover, students will acquire some beneficial personal skills by getting to know different individuals from various backgrounds. This would enhance both their personality and communication skills. For instance, a major company in Canada suggests that productive employees are those who have more experience and have been exposed to different cultures. Therefore, exchange visits are quite essential for building a good personality that helps students in their future careers.
In conclusion, educationalists think that international exchange visits are beneficial for teenagers. Even though there are some disadvantages, I believe that being a part of such programs is more advantageous.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05964912281 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10797978106 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6603547326 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.588235294 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6470588235 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214125293231 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779888174595 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751581906057 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15531410436 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592560517426 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.57 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.