Some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experiences and personal qualities when they look for an employee. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
It is noticed that some recruiters give more value to college degree than personal traits and experience. This essay will intend to shed a light on some reasons that can be attributed to this phenomenon. I disagree with the given statement because it is a negative development.
To begin with, academic qualifications plays a pivotal role in the individual's life. It demonstrates to the others that how much knowledgeable person he is? Some superior given a more stress on a degree of that individual person rather than his life's experiences. Manager look at the person's university degree which is just a piece of paper and appoint that person on to a job without looking at the person's experience. Undoubtedly, nowadays study of an individual matters the most for taking a job which offers a high paying scale to a job holder. Majority of the big enterprises in the nation mostly give a preference to hire any subordinate on to a job by looking at his degree that how much knowledgeable and qualified person he is; that is a good paradigm to mention here. Hence, it is an important part for a boss to appoint an assistant by reviewing his qualifications.
However, not only academic qualification matters the most but also a superior have to take a look on the personal qualities and practical experiences of that person; because to appoint a right person on a right job it is necessary to taking an overview of that individual. If a breadwinner have a high degree but some personal traits like sincerity, politeness, confidence, integrity, honesty, creativity and efforts as well as experience are missing out from his life then it is worthless to hire such a person on a job. A mention worthy example to cite over here is that a degree does not always indicate in any way, that a person always will function in the real world and he is capable to handle a particular situation or he is able to overcome from a critical circumstance. Ergo, hands-on-skills and practical experiences are most important in the present scenario.
Moreover, employee's skills also an important part for recruiting them on a work. These skills are personal skills, technical skills and expertise in the particular field. If a representative having no personal or soft skills then he is not be able to tackle the each situation as well as he may does not work efficiently, so there may be some chances that conflictions arises due to some reasons in a company. Apart from this, a worker was hired by the manager by ignoring his skills then it may be resulted in the interpersonal conflicts, frustration arises and may be a job holder had to leave such a job. To examplify this situation, an assistant was unable to handle the social demands of leadership and so he had to remain at the lower level jobs.
In a conclusion, albeit formal qualifications is important for recruiting staff members in a company yet a manager has to foresee the personal traits and life experiences of that individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-27 | thanhtu000 | 84 | view |
- Nowadays children and teenager play more and more computer games Parents think computer games have little value and more harmful effects What s opinion 68
- Most employers nowadays put increasing emphasis on social skills. Some people believe that social skills are important in addition to good qualifications for job success. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- It is suggested that all young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work, helping people in the community. Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the young people? 78
- Nowadays, older people who need employment have to compete with younger people. What problems does this cause, and what are the solutions. 73
- Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companies However some people think that interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...lifications plays a pivotal role in the individuals life. It demonstrates to the others tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... lifes experiences. Manager look at the persons university degree which is just a piece...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
...erson on a right job it is necessary to taking an overview of that individual. If a br...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'will' and 'function'.
Suggestion: will always function
...ways indicate in any way, that a person always will function in the real world and he is capable to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... personal or soft skills then he is not be able to tackle the each situation as we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, well, apart from, as to, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2473.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 513.0 315.596192385 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82066276803 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0381791375 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460038986355 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 806.4 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7801593389 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.65 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.65 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251547703322 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832513407712 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058236003434 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15380795742 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053167190244 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.