It is true that in today's society employers tend to hire employees who are academically qualified than those who held more life experiences or simply good people. I opine that this change is a mixed blessing that has both benefits and disadvantages for some companies.
On the one hand, it seems that by hiring more employees with academic qualifications can boosts a company's development the way it wants. Since these workers have received proper education from schooling, they can contribute to the business by applying their knowledge that they have learnt from qualified field of works. These staffs are more trustworthy in terms of the level of education they have received. Therefore, by looking through the kind of degree that the person has, the company can easily determine if that is the personnel that they want in their company.
On the other hand, it is equally important to hire experienced workers who own some valuable information from their pervious mistakes. For instance, if a company is facing a severe crisis in its developing stage, an experienced employee would be useful since he or she might have the knowledge of how to solve this very issue. Therefore, by having some experienced personnel in the company, it would be more likely for the company to tackle a major issue or avoid an unwanted situation.
In conclusion, if a business would like to develop further in a the way that any business wanted, it would be important for them to hire both academically qualified and experienced workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...siness would like to develop further in a the way that any business wanted, it would ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02755905512 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80523069259 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.0637263478 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.7 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218073287198 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846107300591 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315711655009 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126188203964 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282009587884 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.