Some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experiences and personal qualities when they look for an employee. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
The substantial influence of academic qualification has sparked the controversy over recent years. These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about employees should be looked after only with professional qualification rather than valuing personal characteristics and experiences. This essay will elaborate the both sides of the argument and I will share my opinion outdo the latter.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons why educational qualification is important, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that helps to perform well in their jobs. Without any doubt skills gained in academics helps the employees in many factors in any jobs. For instance, a computer science engineer will do better programming than anybody else. Eventually, academic qualifications can play a vital role and perfect positive development.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that individual experience is also significant factor as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one lies in the fact that employee could manage tough situations with their life experiences. Firstly, employee will be in a position to relate the problem with previous decision making consequences. Secondly, personal characteristics will also helps like being supportive with team members. Thus, for these few reasons employers will double think on recruitment.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that various importance on educational qualifications for employees in jobs and real-time experiences with characteristics of employee also important in jobs. In my opinion, I would strongly recommend that professional qualifications plays crucial role when considering employees and definitely a positive impact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...dly, personal characteristics will also helps like being supportive with team members...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79770992366 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24314529058 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629770992366 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8069144559 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.846153846 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214402891509 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706264547112 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038341029284 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124189428143 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00885982655589 0.0609392437508 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.