During many decades, learning foreign languages has been considered as a principal course in school curriculum. Some researchers agree with the educating foreign language at elementary school; however, others believe the secondary school is the better time for children to learn a new language. In my opinion, learning a new language from an early age has more benefits which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, some people believe secondary students are more intelligent to grasp language conceptions and could compare easily the new languages with their mother tongue for more comprehending. However, as students enter to higher levels of education, they would face more difficult issues rather than previous years and the heavy educational programs such as advanced mathematics may not give them the opportunity to focus other programs like as foreign languages. Therefore, the elementary school could be the best time for learning the basic and fundamental concept of non-native languages for pupils.
On the other hand, it is inevitable that children and primary schools’ students have fresh and not-involved mind that make the process of learning much more effortless for them. According to the evidence-base experiments, the ability of children’s brain for acquiring the correct grammatical and phonetic structure of foreign language is higher compared with younger. As a result of this, people who learn a foreign language from their primary school or even earlier can be more fluent and ready to become competent in other languages.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that as students become older, they would be involved with difficult and problematic courses that could not focus on foreign languages. Hence, children at elementary school are intrinsically better language learners and become more proficient more quickly because of their brains’ feature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...cipal course in school curriculum. Some resources person agree with the educating foreign...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, as for, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54639175258 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90789070359 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549828178694 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5192226825 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.727272727 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350639107861 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148682146116 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889748982179 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233175040121 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790917154612 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.