In some parts of the world it is increasingly popular to research the history of one's own family. Why do people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Many different countries around the globe are experiencing a rising tendency that is to dig up the family's tree. I believe that there are two reasons leading to this trend: curiosity and medical purposes and I am convinced that it is a positive trend.
Most people do research on the origin of their own family to satisfy their curiosity. People might be curious whether they have royal roots or what life was like centuries ago and there is an urge to fulfil such curiosity. To explain further, satisfaction causes great psychological effects thanks to the release of dopamine in the brain. Moreover, people want to trace back to their origin for medical purposes. They may want to find out if they inherit any genetic diseases to have prompt prevention methods. For example, a recent Harvard University's study shows that 70% of the surveyed people who know they have a family tradition of cancer are more likely to have a health check on a consistent regular basis.
In my view, this tendency is definitely a positive one. Firstly, looking into the family's history helps strengthen the bond between family members. It starts with stories told by parents to meetings with relatives like uncles, aunts, cousins... helping one to establish the intimate connections with the rest of the family. Secondly, family history study allows the next generations deep understanding of the family's traditional values. This encourages one to preserve their family's customs as well as the country's cultural practices. For example, Bat Trang porcelain and pottery village is able to maintain the Vietnamese cultural values in ceramic arts thanks to the practice of passing family historical knowledge from generation to generation of people here.
In conclusion, people tend to investigate their families' historical backgrounds out of curiosity or for medical purposes, which is a positive trend due to the family bond formation and culture preservation, and hence, should be encouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'Many'.
Suggestion: Many
Many different countries around the globe are experien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23899371069 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77902744723 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610062893082 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.067027192 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221076905771 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707930187303 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569152698896 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11415174172 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376336596988 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.