Some peope think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent else where
To what extent do you agree with this view?
According to some/many, the money spent in the field of arts by the government is wasting, and they think that this money can be spent in a better way on other things. In my opinion, spending money in both arts and scientific fields will be valuable.
As everyone knows that the world is developing day by day, and arts is playing a key role in the development of a nation as well as in the economy of a nation. So many arts fields like architecture, construction, designing etc etc should be given enough importance and the government needs to invest money in these fields. For example, architecture attracts many tourists and it has a major role in economy of a country
On the other hand, other field like science and technology should be developed properly to make a nation strong. Science and technology have played a keen role in development of any nation.So it’s the responsibility of a government to spend money in the fields of science and technology, and provide enough oppertunites to the peoples to take advantages from these fields of science and technology.
So according to my conclusion spending money by the government on the fields of arts and science are not wasting in any way, and the government needs to improve both of them in a proper ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: etc
...e architecture, construction, designing etc etc should be given enough importance and t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
... keen role in development of any nation.So it's the responsibility of a gover...
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...eds to improve both of them in a proper ways.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'as well as', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.283950617284 0.247107183377 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.148148148148 0.155533422707 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0617283950617 0.0946595960268 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0288065843621 0.0501214627716 57% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0246913580247 0.0437548338989 56% => OK
Prepositions: 0.148148148148 0.122226691241 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0534979423868 0.0403226058552 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87264864164 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0329218106996 0.0326793684256 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.127572016461 0.0861772015684 148% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0164609053498 0.021408717616 77% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.011925033212 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1277.0 1933.35771543 66% => OK
No of words: 222.0 316.048096192 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75225225225 6.12580529183 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.20517956788 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.315315315315 0.374742101984 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247747747748 0.28420135186 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171171171171 0.203846283523 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130630630631 0.137316102897 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87264864164 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 176.037074148 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477477477477 0.56093040696 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.128751033 60.7387585426 69% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0891783567 44% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 31.7142857143 20.7743622355 153% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3431089962 49.517814964 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.428571429 127.492653851 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 20.7743622355 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.99599198397 75% => OK
Readability: 56.4890604891 49.1944974215 115% => OK
Elegance: 2.40816326531 1.69124875643 142% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30292659067 0.332605444948 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.198641380045 0.102741220458 193% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.123562919961 0.0668466124924 185% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.708390935692 0.534860350844 132% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.179271570838 0.148594505496 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189638983212 0.134430193775 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126381732771 0.0742795772207 170% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.416281514092 0.324371583561 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0371500547693 0.0638462369009 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238949998591 0.228012699653 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107159861757 0.058150111329 184% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 7.0 10.4468937876 67% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.