Some peopel think that one world government is better than national governments Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

The state is the best institute in terms of administration. Some people think it is better to have only one government to administer, whereas I think it would have negative outweighs positive. In this essay, I will explain the reason to support this statement, and the following examples will be provided to support my point of view.

To begin with, the most important reason is that there are individual characteristics of each country whether demographic, geographic, cultural, or even religious, therefore, it is likely hard to launch an acceptable campaign or sustainable policy which is needed to enforce the population of every country. For instance, it is clearly seen that many countries have domestic arguments at present which lead to violence due to some new policy which is launched by their state. Thus, it would bring an international chaotic issue to the world because each country has its own outstanding characteristics.

Additionally, another reason is that the unique valuable culture might vanish or be mixed and become the one. The attractive place where people would like to discover will disappear and the world will be becoming too uninterested anymore. For example, according to the recent news, it has been revealed that in Hong Kong which is regulated by the U.S.A, new generations tend to not give value to their own culture and begin to fade out ultimately. This is a negative thing that might happen if the population world is administered by one state.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that there are negatives outweighing positives if all countries are organized under a government whether in terms of violent issues or disappeared treasured cultures which would happen because of the diversity.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...Hong Kong which is regulated by the U.S.A, new generations tend to not give value...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21071428571 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99351126503 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1602390094 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.636363636 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142068715725 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550908040602 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838818388488 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896737145652 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565748943711 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.